After the opinion statements by Mr. Suraj’s wife, the plaintiff’s
legal team claimed. First, the team argued the fact progress taken for the past
4 years and confirmation of illegality based on what
really happened when incident occurred on March 22, 2010.
After the incident, there had been no explanations provided by the
state to the survivors.
Despite of taking evidence preservation process, the state refused
to disclose various evidences behind.
The video capturing the scene of the incident, which was finally
disclosed, was stopped recording right after Mr. Suraj and officers entered an
aircraft.
Many cruel facts were finally come
out through questioning the immigration officers on these state attitudes of
concealing the truths mentioned above at the trail for state compensation.
-Using unauthorized items such as towels or cable tie.
-Forcing him
to bend as coercive pose
which was unnecessary.
-The
testimony by officers that Mr. Suraj resisted was a lie.
After
that, the team argued the casual relationship between the death
of Mr. Suraj and illegal acts of immigration officers and also stated how
irrational the defendant statement was; Mr. Suraj’s heart stopped, which is related to his heart tumor, at
the very moment when he was forced to bend.
Also, there
had been no scientific evidence provided, rather the state argued only based on
doctor’s testimonies.
Taking these
into consideration, the team stated that it is very clear that Mr. Suraj death
was caused by the coercive acts by officers.
The trail was ended in about 40 minutes, and after that we moved to
another place for report. The report included explanations about closing
arguments and withdrawing of 9 immigration officers as defendant. After that,
there were many questions given by the participants which we could feel their
passions toward the next judgment.
