Monday, August 29, 2011

An assembly to report the case of Mr.Suraj

Yesterday an assembly to report the case of Mr.Suraj was over. A talk by attorney at law took place in front the audience of slightly less than 50 persons. The talk included progress report, problems of the case such as use of instrument of restraint out of court, intentional interruption of videography to record enforcement and outlook of the case.
Cousin of Mr.Suraj from Osaka, friends of Mr.Suraj, supporters were gathered and talked about memory before his death and thoughts of the case. His illustration displayed made his character recalled.

From now truth hunting in the suit against the Japanese government is expected. Timing of trial hearing can be seen in the latest website of APFS. Your participation as courtroom audience is highly appreciated.

Friday, August 5, 2011

Suit against the government of Japan filed over the death of Abubakar Awudu Suraj

On the morning of August 5th, a suit against the government of Japan was filed over the wrongful death of Abubakar Awudu Suraj—a Ghanaian killed during a forced deportation last year. The lawsuit was filed by Suraj's widow and Suraj's mother claiming compensation from the Japanese government and nine Immigration officials who had accompanied Suraj at the time of his death.


Normally, such lawsuits are filed exclusively against the government. However, documents secured during the preservation of evidence clearly showed that the attending immigration officials had purchased nylon ties (which are not permitted for use as restraints) with their own money and then bound Suraj with them, and turned off the video camera recording their actions partway through the deportation. Such circumstances suggest that their acts of abuse were carried out wittingly—and not through negligence and, for that reason, it was decided that these officials should be charged with responsibility along with the state.

Incidentally, when we first filed the petition for the preservation of evidence, the Ministry of Justice had refused to submit interview and other documents relating to the actions of these immigration officials. It was only due to a subsequent breakthrough court order for disclosure that the documents were later released and the actions of the immigration officials came to light. The Ministry of Justice had effectively been trying to hide facts having a significant bearing on this case.

In the afternoon we held a press conference at the National Press Club in Tokyo. Many reporters joined the conference, including several from The Economist and other international media.